With all the Web 2.0 Expo hoopla currently going on, it is clear that it is a money maker for O'Reilly , but for everyone else I think it is all very confusing. For me Web 2.0 is just an evolution the web technology already in place, nothing that merits the new designation of Web 2.0. As Tim Berners-Lee, the father of the web points out (source Britannica):
"Web 1.0 was all about connecting people. It was an interactive space, and I think Web 2.0 is of course a piece of jargon, nobody even knows what it means. If Web 2.0 for you is blogs and wikis, then that is people to people. But that was what the Web was supposed to be all along."
I think the more important effort although not as flashy are the moves to rebuild the underpinnings of the web, the Internet. I found this interesting article in the Princeton Alumni Weekly written by Kenneth Chang, science reporter for the New York Times. He provides a great overview of the history of the Internet with some insights on mistakes that were made which allowed viruses to flourish. Larry Peterson, and Robert Kahn, the fathers of the Internet, are trying to promote a new project called Global Environment for Network Innovations (GENI) and get funding to build an entirely new network from the ground up. I agree with the approach, as the article points it is tough to innovate when you are tied to the current underpinnings of the Internet.
Ramblings for the week of April 28st in My Digital Life
I decided to annotate the title of this weekly post with the word "ramblings" since it more clearly describes the content I write on Monday mornings.
I received my SanDisk 8GB micro SDHC card for my Tilt from Digital Media Outlet for $56 and it includes a USB adapter. It works well with the AT&T Tilt, I just copied the content of my 2GB card to the 8GB card and was on my way...I will be using it heavily this week transferring the contents of my Sony camcorder so I can email selected content to the Kodak Gallery.
I may have found an issue with my Dell XPS 720 disk configuration which might be causing the blue screen. When I installed the RAID 1 array, I use for data, I installed the drives in two bays next to each other without looking at the controller setup. There are 2 SATA controllers in the system and my RAID configurations was using both. Theoretically it should not matter and would provide a redundancy on the controller front, but you never know how the nVidia RAID drivers are architected. I decided to try placing both disks on the same controller, the system seems more stable (it has been up for over 2 days). The jury is out and I will have to see how things go this week.
As HD content includes more and Dolby Digital audio tracks, it is becoming a real pain to switch the Directv DVR audio output between standard PCM and Dolby Digital. I believe the problem is with my older Yamaha AV reciever. It does not automatically detect and switch modes between signal types. So when we switch to a program with PCM audio and the DVR is in Dolby Digital mode, the receiver is still processing the audio as Dolby Digital (that is what output is tagged as) although the content of the stream is PCM. The audio is so low that you cannot listen to it. This off course is only a theory, however from my forum research it seems to be a fairly common issue with certain receivers. I will have to test with a newer receiver to validate. I will probably try to stick with a Yamaha receiver, I always found them to be solid good sounding units. The local audio/video chain has a 30 day return policy so I should be in good shape, they also match the big box store pricing...
This week:
Posted by sskarlatos on April 28, 2008 at 09:06 AM in AT&T Tilt, Commentary, Dell XPS 720, Directv, Thinkpad X60, Travel Technology, Web/Tech, Windows Mobile | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us