My home wireless network configuration has two Linksys WRT54G-TMO routers (one upstairs and one downstairs) wired into a D-Link DFL-210 router connected to Verizon's FIOS network. I set them up to operate as Access Points using the bridge option, turning off the firewall and DHCP options. I use the same SSID on both routers for seamless roaming all over the house.
Under the Basic Setup screen/Internet Setup you need to switch to Static IP and enter a dummy IP address. Under Network Setup you need to enter a Static IP address on your network and disable DHCP Server (this static ip address will become the router's IP address). You then need to plug the cable from your wired router into one of the LAN ports. In this configuration you do not use the WAN port.
Under the Advanced Settings you need to set the Operating Mode to Bridge and the Dynamic Routing to LAN & Wireless.
Under the Security tab you need to disable the Firewall Protection. The Firewall won't work since there you are not using the WAN port.
This configuration works very well for me and our Samsung T409 phones roam seamlessly across the house and onto our back patio even though we a 4 bar cell signal in the backyard. I just can't say enough good things about the [email protected] service, all we need is a wired phone adapter to use the phones around the house and it would be close to perfect...
I did a similar thing at my house, but am having trouble with certain traffic. In particular native IPv6 from one router never makes it through the second one, but I'm not sure where along the way it gets lost.
Do you, by chance, do any ip6 over this connection? I'd be interested if it works for you.
Posted by: Chris Carlin | August 16, 2007 at 02:36 PM
I have not tried IPv6 yet.
Posted by: Stephen Skarlatos | August 28, 2007 at 07:30 AM
I have the exact same setup except my 2 WRT54G-TM0 are connected to a Verizon FIOS Actiontec router. A few questions if you have the time.
1) Did you switch your t409 phone to AP Mode to get seemless wireless coverage? If so do you loose the power savings ability the WRT54G-TMO provides for your phone (Main reason for the TMO product)?
2) I tried a small variation on your setup: Left the DHCP enabled and used the WAN port of the WRT54G-TMO to connect to the main router. The other difference if I set Configuration to "BOTH" instead of "LAN & Wireless". I thought this would prevent the need to create a static local address and leave all 4 WRT54G-TMO ports open. However this seems to cause the router to be unaccessiable. Do you know the problem with this approach?
3) Lastly has anyone been able to connect there tmobile hotspot phone directly to the Verizon FIOS actiontec router. I have had a lot of tech support without resolution. I turned off all security and firewalls. The phone draws an IP address on the router but the phone returns with an error W6000.2. tmobile best guess is that my Verizon ISP is blocking IPSEC. However this seems unlikely since all my Access Points (WRT54G-TMO, WAP-4400N) connected to the Actiontec work perfectly with the t409 phone.
Posted by: Kevin | September 11, 2007 at 11:00 AM
Sorry for the delay. Here are some answers.
1.Yes and no you do not loose the power saving functionality, although roaming between APs does use more power.
2. I am not certain, but I think it has to do with the internal packet routing between the WAN and LAN.
3. Since I removed the ActionTech from my network, I have not tried it.
Posted by: Stephen Skarlatos | September 14, 2007 at 01:51 PM
its not working with your actiontec because of the wireless chipset in it. perhaps its not fully 802.11 complient, not sure really, but its definitely something to do with the wireless chipset. thats why it works when you connect it through another router.
Posted by: kraker | November 06, 2007 at 02:55 AM